home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: vb.franken.de!volker
- From: volker@vb.franken.de (Volker Barthelmann)
- Subject: Re: Is this a SAS/C bug or have I coded it wrong?
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- References: <4cfrc5$gsc@misery.millcomm.com> <4cm9kc$kf7@news.isc.rit.edu> <DKu1Cw.93w@unx.sas.com>
- X-Newsreader: TIN [AMIGA 1.3 950726BETA PL0]
- Message-ID: <volker.0e5e@vb.franken.de>
- Date: 8 Jan 96 23:13:08 MET
- Organization: home
-
- Doug Walker (walker@twix.unx.sas.com) wrote:
- : In article <4cm9kc$kf7@news.isc.rit.edu>, <mjp3783@alpha.isc.rit.edu> wrote:
- : >> tmpbuf[10];
- : >>
- : >I assume this was a mis-type and that this should have been:
- : >int tmpbuf[10];
- :
- : Not really, the two are exactly equivalent. If no type is
- : provided on variable's definition in ANSI C, "int" is
- : assumed.
-
- Are You sure about that? I was under the impression that ANSI C required
- at least a type-specifier, type-qualifier or storage-class-specifier for
- a declaration.
-
- Volker
-
-